1 April 2010

The Legal Services Board approves Bar Standards Board applications designed to relax provisions in Code of Conduct for barristers' working practices  
Significant changes to the Code of Conduct now for the first time permit barristers to:
�¡Become managers of Legal Disciplinary Practices (LDPs)
�¡Work in partnerships
�¡Work in both a self-employed capacity and employed capacity at the same time (although not in the same case)
�¡Hold shares in LDPs
�¡Share premises and office facilities with others
�¡Investigate and collect evidence and witness statements
�¡Attend police stations
�¡Conduct correspondence
In addition, there has been a significant extension to the Public Access Scheme.
The Legal Services Board (LSB) approved three applications, submitted by the BSB, that change or relax provisions in the Code of Conduct relating to barristers' working practices. The code amendments and the guidance approved by the LSB take immediate effect.
The LSB (which has taken over responsibility to approve such amendments from the Ministry of Justice), approved the following applications:
�¡LDP Application - This application arises from the Board decisions in November 2009 to permit barristers to work as managers in Legal Disciplinary Practices (LDPs), to work in a ‘dual capacity', to hold shares in LDPs, to work in partnerships.
�¡The Structure of Self-Employed Practice Application - This application also arose from the November 2009 Board meeting and in many ways complements the first by enabling the Bar to offer services to consumers in a variety of flexible ways, including permitting barristers to: share premises and office facilities with others, investigate and collect evidence and witness statements, attend police stations, conduct correspondence.
 
�¡The Public Access Scheme Application - This application follows the review of the public access scheme in 2009.  It is a further set of changes designed to enable greater direct access to barristers' services for consumers and permits barristers to: offer services in an enlarged area and to engage in correspondence between parties.
Commenting on the LSB's approval of the BSB's Code amendments, Baroness Deech, BSB Chair, said:
"The BSB is committed to making appropriate changes to permitted practice at the Bar to benefit its clients in terms of greater access to barristers' services, broadening the range of services available from the Bar, giving consumers more choice and bringing down costs whilst maintaining the high standards associated with the Bar. The BSB is therefore very pleased that the LSB has approved these three applications as submitted."
 
Notes to the Editor
1.The following link takes you to application decisions on the Legal Services Board's website:
http://www.legalservicesboard.org.uk/what_we_do/regulation/applications.htm
2. For more information please contact the Bar Standards Board Press Office on 020 7067 0123
3.Visit the Bar Standards Board website at www.barstandardsboard.org.uk

In their judgment, upholding the original tribunal's decision the EAT stated that this behaviour constituted direct discrimination contrary to sections 1(1)(a) and 4(2)(b) of the Race Relations Act 1976 as the decision not to appoint her was based solely on her ethnic origin and despite Amnesty's potentially justifiable reasons. (James v Eastleigh Borough Council [1990] 2 AC 751 applied). The claim for constructive dismissal failed.

 Written by Rebecca Fitton-Brown, barrister at New Walk Chambers, specialising in family law.

Sally, who achieved a Distinction, is seen here with the Course Director, Pascale Lorber, and David Monk.

For those who want to follow the media discussion, the story is taken up by the Daily Telegraph, the Daily Mail, the Independent and the Guardian newspapers.

School appeals are likely to feature further in the news over the next few weeks, with more school appeal statistics due out on Thursday and with a forthcoming High Court ruling on the powers of appeal panels.

 Ian Jones is a barrister specialising in school appeals and education law at New Walk Chambers, Leicester.

Written by Kajal Dasani, Barrister at New Walk Chambers, specialising in Immigration Law.

 Statistically about one in three appeals is successful, so the majority will not be allowed. This statistic masks a range of experience, depending on the type on school and the respective strengths of the admission authority's case and that of the parents.

Many appeals are still waiting to be heard. It may not be too late to obtain professional advice for your child's appeal or representation at the hearing. Please click here for further details.

But if you have already been through the appeal process, what can you do if your school appeal fails? If an independent appeal panel refuses your admission appeal, this decision is final and binding. There is no further appeal. Their decision can only be challenged if the panel did not follow the proper process, got the law wrong or came to a decision which was so unreasonable that no panel in their right minds would have come to the same decision. Simply disagreeing with the decision is not sufficient.

If you think the appeal panel ‘got it wrong', you have three choices. You can ‘put up with' the result, or you can refer the case to the Local Government Ombudsman to investigate, or you can bring a claim for judicial review. If you are thinking of pursuing the complaint, you must do so quickly, as there are legal time limits and any delay may make it even harder to obtain a place at your preferred school.

Written by Ian Jones, barrister at New Walk Chambers, specialising in School Appeals.